|
|
LWVCT’s Viewpoint on Rule 10.1 (Resolutions)
At Council 2007 LWVUS initiated a conversation about the use of resolutions. This conversation led to a larger discussion of program, action and what constitutes member understanding and agreement. Some delegates conveyed their belief that the increasing use of resolutions at recent Conventions reflected the degree of frustration felt by delegates in trying to get their voices and issues heard. Reportedly, LWVUS proposed Rule 10.1 in order to address comments, made at Council 2007 and to respond to input by leagues after Council, regarding the use of resolutions.
LWVCT agrees with many components of this resolution, but disagrees with others. Ultimately we believe that the adverse features outweigh the positive and that the proposed rule should be amended or defeated.
We agree with the requirements that · resolutions be sent to all leagues 4 weeks in advance of convention (10.1 B1) · the maker of the resolution be a convention delegate (10.1 B2.) · the notice of the resolution include a rationale, along with pros and cons (10.1 B3).
We also can support the formation of a resolutions committee (part of 10.1 C) but disagree with its proposed composition and its assignment.
Because we are a grassroots organization, the composition of the committee should reflect all levels of the organization. As currently drafted, the proposal would allow all five members to be current and former LWVUS board members. (10.1 C). The LWVUS perspective toward resolutions will be well represented by two LWVUS members of the committee. However, state and local perspectives must be represented when reviewing resolutions. We believe that current state and local League board leaders should complete the balance of the committee.
We strongly disagree with the committee’s review criteria (10.1 D 1-7) for evaluating resolutions. We recommend their removal. The criteria would restrict, rather than promote, delegate debate. Some criteria are too restrictive, some too ambiguous, and others too arbitrary.
We believe that the committee’s role should be limited to ensuring that resolutions meet the requirements of 10.1 B and to presenting all resolutions, so qualified, to the convention delegates for consideration. The crafting and processing of resolutions that meet the requirements of 10.1 B demonstrate commitment and forethought. The delegate body should be allowed to consider all qualified resolutions.
League of Women Voters of Connecticut Jara Burnett, President Nancy Bassett, VP, Program Cheryl Dunson, VP, Public Issues Carole Young-Kleinfeld, VP, Communications
5/23/08
LWVUS Convention 2008
Proposed Rule 10.1 –Procedure for Resolutions:
Debate and action on resolutions shall take place immediately after action and debate on proposed program. A majority vote is required to adopt a resolution.
LWVUS
|
|