|
|
LWVCT Proposed Amendment to Proposed Rule 10.1—Procedure for Resolutions Additions are underlined; removals are [in brackets]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Resolutions may be presented for consideration. B. In order to present a resolution:
a) Background information including the pros and cons of the issue presented by the resolution. b) Explanation of the rationale for using this form of member understanding and agreement.
E. The Resolutions Committee shall make a written report of its findings. The chair of the Resolutions Committee shall announce the committee’s findings to the Convention at the outset of the Sunday plenary and the written report shall be posted and distributed for consideration of the delegates. All resolutions meeting the criteria described in B shall be presented to the delegates. F. Motions to adopt resolutions must be made at the Sunday plenary. The President may rule a motion out of order. The delegates may override, by a two-thirds vote, the decision of the President regarding the motions. G. Debate and action on resolutions shall take place immediately after action and debate on proposed program. A majority vote is required to adopt a resolution.
Rationale This amendment offers a light touch in providing guidance to Leagues in the process for proposing resolutions--guidance which has not been available in past conventions. It offers a way for the League to respond to concerns that may have arisen after the program planning deadline, to remain nimble in addressing emerging concerns related to our League positions, and to help ensure that our organization remain a relevant, energetic force in the future. It also suggests a way to inform convention delegates about proposed resolutions before arriving at Convention. Some of the most stimulating discussions at past conventions have been elicited by resolutions. This proposal has grown out of numerous discussions with League leaders around the country, at Council 2007 and through additional correspondence. The resolutions committee members should be selected from those currently serving on League boards in order to benefit from their active involvement in current League issues and from experience in League leadership. Local League board members should be eligible for selection because many local Leagues provide the same opportunities for development of leadership skills as state Leagues. The charge to the resolutions committee should be limited to an administrative function, as outlined in Sections B and E (as amended) and should not preempt the role of the delegates in considering and debating resolutions, nor seek to limit the content of resolutions. The crafting and processing of resolutions that meet the requirements of 10.1 B demonstrate commitment and forethought. The delegate body should be allowed to consider all qualified resolutions. Because resolutions committee members are, by definition, delegates to the LWVUS Convention, they have the same opportunity as any other delegate to address resolutions during the debate session. Items 1-7 of Section D
should be eliminated because the criteria would restrict, rather than promote,
delegate debate. Some criteria are too restrictive, some too ambiguous, and
others too arbitrary.
CON: places a burden on
the maker by requiring advance notice; may make convention planning more
complex. LWVCT May 2008 |
|